"The human voice is, as a matter of fact, the privileged (eidetic) site of difference: a site which escapes all science, for there is no science (physiology, history, aesthetics, psychoanalysis) which exhausts the voice: no matter how much you classify and comment on music historically, sociologically, aesthetically, technically, there will always be a remainder, a supplement, a lapse, something non-spoken which designates itself: the voice. This always different object is assigned by psychoanalysis to the category of objects of desire: there is no human voice which is not an object of desire—or of repulsion: there is no neutral voice—and if sometimes that neutrality, that whiteness of the voice occurs, it terrifies us, as if we were to discover a frozen world, one which in which desire was dead. Every relation to a voice is necessarily erotic, and this is why it is in the voice that music's difference is so apparent—its constraint to evaluate, to affirm" (Music, Voice, Language pp. 280)
No comments:
Post a Comment